Adele Thomas does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that will benefit from this short article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
University of Johannesburg provides funding as a partner of The Conversation AFRICA.
The Conversation UK receives funding from the organisations
Republish our articles free of charge, online or perhaps in print, under Creative Commons licence.
Academic plagiarism is no longer just sloppy “cut and paste” jobs or students cribbing large chunks of an assignment from a friend’s earlier essay on the same topic. These days, students can simply visit some of a number of paper or essay mills that litter the internet and purchase a completed assignment to provide as their own.
These businesses that are shadowy not going away anytime soon. Paper mills can’t be easily shut or policed down by legislation. And there’s a trickier issue at play here: they supply a service which an alarming wide range of students will happily use.
Managing this newest form of academic deceit will demand hard work from established academia and a renewed commitment to integrity from university communities.
Unmasking the “shadow scholar”
In November 2010, the Chronicle of Higher writing essay for money Education published an article that rocked the world that is academic. Its author that is anonymous confessed having written more than 5000 pages of scholarly work each year on behalf of university students. Ethics was among the list of issues that are many author had tackled for clients.
The practice continues 5 years on. At a conference about plagiarism held when you look at the Czech Republic in June 2015, one speaker revealed that as much as 22% of students in some australian programmes that are undergraduate admitted to purchasing or going to buy assignments on the net.
In addition emerged that the paper mill business was booming. One site claims to get two million hits every month for its 5000 free downloadable papers. Another allows cheats to interview the people electronically who will write their papers. Some even claim to employ university professors to make sure the standard of work.
An example of one of the paper that is many that a simple Google search brings up.
Policing and legislation becomes rather difficult due to the fact company selling assignments may be domiciled in america while its “suppliers”, the ghostwriters, are based elsewhere in the field. Your client, a university student, could be anywhere in the world – New York City, Lagos, London, Nairobi or Johannesburg.
No quick fixes
If the companies and writers are typical shadows, how do paper mills be stopped? The answers most likely lie with university students – along with the academics who help them learn.
The anonymous writer whose paper mill tales shocked academia explained into the piece which kinds of students were utilizing these services and merely how much they were ready to pay. In the right time of writing, he was making about US$66,000 annually. His three main client groups were students for whom English is a moment language; students who are struggling academically and people who will be lazy and rich.
His criticism is stinging:
I live well in the desperation, misery, and incompetence that your educational system has created.
Ideally, lecturers into the system of which he’s so dismissive should be aware of their students and therefore be able to detect abnormal patterns of work. But with large undergraduate classes of 500 students or more, this known standard of engagement is impossible. The chance for greater engagement that is direct students rises at postgraduate levels as class sizes drop.
Academics also needs to carefully design their types of assessment mainly because could serve to deter students from buying assignments and dissertations. Again, this method is much more feasible with smaller numbers of postgraduate students and live dissertation defences.
This isn’t foolproof. Students may still take the right time for you to familiarise themselves with the contents of the documents they’ve bought to enable them to respond to questions without exposing their dishonesty.
In the conference, some academics suggested that students should write assignments on templates furnished by their university which will track when work is undertaken so when it’s incorporated into the document. However, this type of remedy is still being developed.
There is certainly another nagging problem with calling on academics alone to tackle plagiarism. Research suggests that numerous may themselves be guilty of the identical offence or may ignore their students’ dishonesty simply because they feel investigating plagiarism takes time that is too much.
It has also been proved that cheating behaviour thrives in environments where you can find few or no consequences. But perhaps herein lies a remedy which could aid in addressing the dilemma of plagiarism and paper mills.
Universities exist to advance thought leadership and moral development in society.
As a result, their academics should be role models and must promote behaviour that is ethical the academy. There should be a zero tolerance policy for academics who cheat. Extensive instruction ought to be provided to students in regards to the pitfalls of cheating as well as must certanly be taught processes to improve their academic writing skills.
Universities must develop a culture of integrity and keep maintaining this through ongoing dialogue concerning the values on which academia is based. Additionally they need certainly to develop institutional responsibility that is moral really examining how student cheating is dealt with, confronting academics’ resistance to reporting and working with such cheating, and taking a difficult stand on student teaching.
Should this be done well then institutional values will become internalised and practised since the norm. Developing such cultures requires determined leadership at senior university levels.